izhilzha (izhilzha) wrote,

  • Mood:

Reviewing excellent television: two episodes of Numb3rs

I've enjoyed this 2nd season of Numb3rs; the producers/writers, the actors, and everyone else have been quietly proving that it wasn't a one-season wonder. I've missed some of the rich interplay between the two brothers, but there have been solid episodes, clever math-related plots, and well-placed backstory.

But you know how some people "save the best for last"? If the latest two episodes are any indication, we may be in for a really good final third of the season.


Written by the creators, husband/wife team Nicolas Falacci and Cheryl Heuton.

I wasn't sure how this episode was going to play out. The promos CBS aired were somewhat manipulative, implying that Alan Eppes was going to be implicated in bombings that were somehow connected to Vietnam-era peace protests. And I have a hard time buying Alan-the-just as a bomber. (Can you blame me?) Also, I get a little twitchy whenever shows set in present-day tackle the issue of war and peace protests--mostly because I live in Hollywood and I get bombarded (pun not intended, actually) by anti-war propoganda everywhere I go anyway.

I underestimated these writers. Shame on me. I have rarely seen a more balanced portrayal--between government and dissenting citizens, between anti-war (I mean, they may be right) and pro-military, between different ways of doing one's job and making one's voice heard. By balanced, I don't mean just saying "both have their merits," either: I mean "both have their merits, and both have their bad side, their extremists." That's such a realistic view that I have to applaud the show simply for pulling that off.

The one small flaw I found in this episode was not enough Charlie. :-) It was Don's episode, through and through. Charlie helped with the math, as usual, but the conflicts in the case came because Don had to deal with peace activists and their families, some of whom were completely screwed over by the FBI back when this case was originally being investigated. He also had to deal with a retired agent, one who had gone undercover with this protest group, and whose cover persona had been indirectly responsible for inspiring the original bombing. A time of questioning his profession, after a fashion; but I though Don did an excellent job, doing his own investigating, refusing to simply take as gospel everything the retired agent tried to foist on him.

And Don had to deal with Alan--who was part of this protest group, and who apparently has his own bias against the FBI after the railroading and disappearence of the bombing suspect, who was a friend of Alan's. The tension between Don and Alan is tight in this episode, but Don gets around that too, eventually, and Alan brings out information he has and helps them figure out who the real bomber may have been...and who's recreating the bombings now.

I was impressed by the short conversation at the end of the episode, where Don tries to tell Alan that even if the FBI has a spotty record, the organization is different now. They have a moment of brutal honesty--Alan: "You know what my first thought was when you joined the FBI?" Don: "Where'd I go wrong?" Alan: "Actually, yeah." And yet they manage to bring it back to the fact that they respect each other; Alan knows that Don is good at his job, and respects him for doing it; and Don says he'd respect anything his father was involved in.

You just know there's a whole other reason here why Don went off to Arizona after joining the Buearu...he knew Alan wasn't thrilled with his choice of career.

But they've gotten over it enough, even with this case dragging it all up again, to wind up teasing each other.

Don: Commie.
Alan: G-man.

When this show is on target, I really, really love it. :-)

"Mind Games"

Again, written by Nicolas Falacci, Cheryl Heuton, apparently from a story by Peter MacNicol (aka Larry).

We've got a similar sort of conflict here as we do in "Protest," a conflict of methodology. Although given the way people talk about it, this goes a little deeper, down to what people believe in: purely things that can be proved (Charlie falls firmly on this side of the fence) or also, occasionally, in things that cannot be proved/haven't yet been proved (Larry providing the most eloquent defense of this position).

I'm not a fan of psychic characters, as a rule, especially not in my crime dramas. They usually come off as arrogant or manipulative, and Kraft (this week's main guest star), played smoothly by John Glover (Lionel Luthor from Smallville), is no different. I did enjoy the way in which the episode left us without a completely solid answer as to whether Kraft honestly had any extra-sensory abilities or not. Nothing he does is anything that couldn't potentially be explained in some way (even guessing at Megan's family background could just mean he's an incredibly shrewd people-reader).

The central conflict of the episode is that of Charlie's worldview with that of everyone else around him. Charlie is the only one we see who adamantly refuses to entertain the notion that Kraft may actually have these abilities. Given that it's Charlie's math which solves the case, part of me is abosolutely on Charlie's side.

But I found it hard to disagree with Don (who simply is willing to use whatever means may afford him a lead on the case), and with Alan (who thinks that Charlie just doesn't quite 'get' the messiness that is ordinary life), and especially with Larry. Larry's problem isn't so much that Charlie isn't willing to admit the possibility of ESP (though he does express interest in the idea), but that Charlie isn't willing to open his mind to the possibility that there are things out there that have yet to be discovered, much less proved. Larry's background in superstring theory makes him a perfect advocate in this area; string theory is currently only being proved through math (which Charlie should know), and a lot of it is airy theorizing, which is then tested to the extent that it can be tested. Our technology isn't up to most of that right now--string theory is not testable by experimentation. Yet. "What kind of 'reality' are we talking about?" he asks Charlie as they stand in the cafeteria buying lunch. "Newtonian reality? Einsteinian reality? Quantum reality?"

Friends and mentor/student, Larry and Charlie still fundamentally disagree in this one area. Charlie calls Larry's belief in possibilites "blind faith"; and in the line of the night, Larry refers to Charlie's unwillingness to entertain another view of things by saying, "That's not science. That's politics."

Now I'm wondering if Charlie has any concept of the possible existence of God; and whether Larry believes in a God or not, and if he does, how he would talk about it.

Another fine episode...marred only by the relative absence of Don, as Rob Morrow prepares to direct the next episode.

All in all, I'm really looking forward to the rest of the season.

Not to mention season 1 on DVD in May!
Tags: alan eppes, don eppes, numb3rs, politics, review, war

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.